Total-Debt-to-Total-Assets Ratio

What Is the Total-Debt-to-Total-Assets Ratio?

Total-debt-to-total-assets is a leverage ratio that defines the total amount of debt relative to assets owned by a company. Using this metric, analysts can compare one company's leverage with that of other companies in the same industry. This information can reflect how financially stable a company is. The higher the ratio, the higher the degree of leverage (DoL) and, consequently, the higher the risk of investing in that company.

Key Takeaways

  • The total-debt-to-total-assets ratio shows the degree to which a company has used debt to finance its assets.
  • The calculation considers all of the company's debt, not just loans and bonds payable, and considers all assets, including intangibles.
  • The total-debt-to-total-assets ratio is calculated by dividing a company's total amount of debt by the company's total amount of assets.
  • If a company has a total-debt-to-total-assets ratio of 0.4, 40% of its assets are financed by creditors, and 60% are financed by owners' (shareholders') equity.
  • The ratio does not inform users of the composition of assets nor how a single company's ratio may compare to others in the same industry.
1:42

Total Debt to Total Assets

Understanding the Total-Debt-to-Total-Assets Ratio

The total-debt-to-total-assets ratio analyzes a company's balance sheet by including long-term and short-term debt (borrowings maturing within one year), as well as all assets—both tangible and intangible, such as goodwill. It indicates how much debt is used to carry a firm's assets, and how those assets might be used to service debt. It, therefore, measures a firm's degree of leverage.

Debt servicing payments must be made under all circumstances, otherwise, the company would breach its debt covenants and run the risk of being forced into bankruptcy by creditors. While other liabilities such as accounts payable and long-term leases can be negotiated to some extent, there is very little “wiggle room” with debt covenants.

A company with a high degree of leverage may thus find it more difficult to stay afloat during a recession than one with low leverage. It should be noted that the total debt measure does not include short-term liabilities such as accounts payable and long-term liabilities such as capital leases and pension plan obligations.

The Formula for Total-Debt-to-Total-Assets Is

 TD/TA = Short-Term Debt + Long-Term Debt Total Assets \begin{aligned} &\text{TD/TA} = \frac{ \text{Short-Term Debt} + \text{Long-Term Debt} }{ \text{Total Assets} } \\ \end{aligned} TD/TA=Total AssetsShort-Term Debt+Long-Term Debt

What Does the Total-Debt-to-Total-Assets Ratio Tell You?

Total-debt-to-total-assets is a measure of the company's assets that are financed by debt rather than equity. When calculated over a number of years, this leverage ratio shows how a company has grown and acquired its assets as a function of time.

Investors use the ratio to evaluate whether the company has enough funds to meet its current debt obligations and to assess whether the company can pay a return on its investment. Creditors use the ratio to see how much debt the company already has and whether the company can repay its existing debt. This will determine whether additional loans will be extended to the firm.

A ratio greater than 1 shows that a considerable portion of the assets is funded by debt. In other words, the company has more liabilities than assets. A high ratio also indicates that a company may be putting itself at risk of defaulting on its loans if interest rates were to rise suddenly.

A ratio below 0.5, meanwhile, indicates that a greater portion of a company's assets is funded by equity. This often gives a company more flexibility, as companies can increase, decrease, pause, or cancel future dividend plans to shareholders. Alternatively, once locked into debt obligations, a company is often legally bound to that agreement.

A total-debt-to-total-asset ratio greater than one means that if the company were to cease operating, not all debtors would receive payment on their holdings.

Real-World Example of the Total-Debt-to-Total-Assets Ratio

Let's examine the total-debt-to-total-assets ratio for three companies:

  • Alphabet, Inc. (Google), as of its fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2022.
  • Costco Wholesale, as of its fiscal quarter ending May 8, 2022.
  • Hertz Global Holdings, as of its fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2022.
Debt to Assets Comparison
(data in millions) Google Costco Hertz
Total Debt $107,633 $31,845 $18,239
Total Assets $359,268 $63,852 $20,941
Total Debt to Assets 0.30 0.50 0.87
Debt to Assets Comparison

From the example above, the companies are ordered from lowest degree of flexibility to highest degree of flexibility.

  • Google is not weighed down by debt obligations and will likely be able to secure additional capital at potentially lower rates compared to the other two companies. Although its debt balance is more than three times higher than Costco, it carries proportionally less debt compared to total assets compared to the other two companies.
  • Costco has been financed nearly evenly split between debt and equity. This means the company carries roughly the same amount of debt as it does in retained earnings, common stock, and net income.
  • Hertz is relatively known for carrying a high degree of debt on its balance sheet. Although its debt balance is smaller than the other two companies, almost 90% of all the assets it owns are financed. Hertz has the lowest degree of flexibility of these three companies as it has legal obligations to fulfill (whereas Google has flexibility regarding dividend distributions to shareholders).

It's also important to understand the size, industry, and goals of each company to interpret their total-debt-to-total-assets. Google is no longer a technology start-up; it is an established company with proven revenue models that is easier to attract investors. Meanwhile, Hertz is a much smaller company that may not be as enticing to shareholders. Hertz may find the demands of investors are too great to secure financing, turning to financial institutions for its capital instead.

Total-debt-to-total-assets may be reported as a decimal or a percentage. For example, Google's .30 total-debt-to-total-assets may also be communicated as 30%. This means 30% of Google's assets are financed through debt.

Limitations of the Total-Debt-to-Total-Assets Ratio

One shortcoming of the total-debt-to-total-assets ratio is that it does not provide any indication of asset quality since it lumps all tangible and intangible assets together.

For example, in the example above, Hertz is reporting $2.9 billion of intangible assets, $611 million of PPE, and $1.04 billion of goodwill as part of its total $20.9 billion of assets. Therefore, the company has more debt on its books than all of its current assets. Should all of its debts be called immediately by lenders, the company would be unable to pay all its debt, even if the total-debt-to-total-assets ratio indicates it might be able to.

As with all other ratios, the trend of the total-debt-to-total-assets ratio should be evaluated over time. This will help assess whether the company’s financial risk profile is improving or deteriorating. For example, an increasing trend indicates that a business is unwilling or unable to pay down its debt, which could indicate a default in the future.

What Is a Good Total-Debt-to-Total-Assets Ratio?

A company's total-debt-to-total-assets ratio is specific to that company's size, industry, sector, and capitalization strategy. For example, start-up tech companies are often more reliant on private investors and will have lower total-debt-to-total-asset calculations. However, more secure, stable companies may find it easier to secure loans from banks and have higher ratios. In general, a ratio around 0.3 to 0.6 is where many investors will feel comfortable, though a company's specific situation may yield different results.

Is a Low Total-Debt-to-Total-Asset Ratio Good?

A low total-debt-to-total-asset ratio isn't necessarily good or bad. It simply means that the company has decided to prioritize raising money by issuing stock to investors instead of taking out loans at a bank. While a lower calculation means a company avoids paying as much interest, it also means owners retain less residual profits because shareholders may be entitled to a portion of the company's earnings.

How Do I Calculate Total-Debt-to-Total-Assets?

The total-debt-to-total-asset ratio is calculated by dividing a company's total debts by its total assets. All debts are considered, and all assets are considered.

Can A Company's Total-Debt-to-Total-Asset Ratio Be Too High?

No, a company's total-debt-to-total-asset ratio can't be too high. Even if a company has a ratio close to 100%, this simply means the company has decided to not to issue much (if any) stock. It is simply an indication of the strategy management has incurred to raise money.

The downside to having a high total-debt-to-total-asset ratio is it may become too expensive to incur additional debt. The company will likely already be paying principal and interest payments, eating into the company's profits instead of being re-invested into the company.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Google. "Form 10-Q," Page 5.

  2. Costco Wholesale. "Costco Wholesale Corporation Reports Third Quarter and Year-to-Date Operating Results for Fiscal 2022."

  3. Hertz. "Form 10-Q," Page 5.